Otto Von Bismarck: The Chief Architect of Germany
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63062/trt/2k22a.11105Keywords:
Germany, Bismarck, Military, Economic, German Empire, LeadershipAbstract
The cultivation of a distinct cultural identity within the German Empire was achieved through a deliberate process of Germanization, targeting both Germans and racial communities. This cultural assimilation granted Germany dominance over non-Germanic languages. The transformative era witnessed comprehensive reforms that propelled Germany to a position of prominence in military, economic, and societal domains, a legacy shaped under the watchful eye of Bismarck. The impact of these shifts in power dynamics reverberated throughout Europe, only to be later revoked from Germany. Post-unification, Bismarck directed his political endeavors towards preserving European peace, demonstrating adept foreign diplomatic strategies. His successful initiatives, including alliance formations and strategic wars, earned him the title of the Iron Chancellor of Prussia. Bismarck's leadership style in domestic affairs was marked by a lack of definitive principles, navigating complexities, unresolved issues, and conflicting interests. His support for Kulturkampf intensified opposition from nationalists and liberals, complicating governance. While granting voting rights in 1863, Bismarck, perhaps misjudging the evolving Prussian landscape, inadvertently destabilized the German government. His authoritarian measures aimed at protecting monarchy and Junkers further alienated Jews, liberals, Catholics, socialists, and democratic factions. The underestimation of Prussian transformation underscored the challenges in his political decisions.
References
Baev, V. G. (2020). Otto von Bismarck and Germany Militarization (Legislative Formalization of the Military Reform in Germany in the 80s of the 19th century). Lex Russica, 9, 77–87. https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2020.166.9.077-087
Barkin, K., & Pflanze, O. (1992). Bismarck and the Development of Germany. German Studies Review, 15(2), 394. https://doi.org/10.2307/1431195
Fay, S. B. (1950). Bismarck’s welfare state. Current History, 18(101), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1525/curh.1950.18.101.1
Gray, M. W., & Kent, G. O. (1980). Bismarck and His Times. German Studies Review, 3(3), 477. https://doi.org/10.2307/1429186
Horn, D., Fishman, S., & Steinberg, M. S. (1979). Reform and Revolution in German Education, 1890-1935. History of Education Quarterly, 19(4), 485. https://doi.org/10.2307/368057
Khoudour-Castéras, D. (2008). Welfare State and Labor Mobility: The Impact of Bismarck’s Social Legislation on German Emigration before World War I. The Journal of Economic History, 68(1), 211–243. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022050708000077
Kreklau, C. (1988). The German History Society. German History, 6(3), 97–98. https://doi.org/10.1191/0266355404gh309xx
Pflanze, O. (1971). Bismarck and Development of Germany, Volume 1/1: The Period of Fortification, 1880-1898. Princeton University Press.
Pflanze, O. (1990). Bismarck and the development of Germany. Princeton University.
Pflanze, O. (2014). Bismarck and the development of Germany. Volume II, The period of consolidation, 1871-1880. Princeton University Press.
Seligmann, M. S. (2011). Bismarck, Otto von (1815-1898). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444338232.wbeow067
Steinberg, J. (2013). Bismarck: A Life. Oxford University Press.
Taylor, A. J. P. (2002). Bismarck: the man and the statesman. Penguin.
Kitschelt, H. (1993). Class structure and social Democratic Party strategy. British Journal of Political Science, 23(3), 299-337. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123400006633
